Namely in reference to the 2012 Australian Federal
Government proposed marine park network around Australia, which sees to protect
10% of Australia's coastal and marine areas. This network is in lines
with the Aichi target that set a goal of protecting 10% of all coastal and
marine areas in an effective and equitable manner. However, since the
proposition of this network of parks, not much has happened. The re-zoning of
the Great Barrier Reef in 2004 was considered a great success for fisheries and
conservation of biodiversity, it was a true tale of triumph of management. Not only did these plans help the fisheries industries, but it was beneficial for the environment as well. However, the parks planned by the Federal Government have been
predicted to fail in protecting the most ecologically crucial parts of the ocean whilst boosting an economically unsustainable industry.
This is because, in the plans that have been proposed have
failed to meet one of the key criteria of the Aichi target for protected areas.
They are massively under-representative of the natural biodiversity of the
regions they are needed to protect. Instead, what is protected are areas that
experience the least amount of stress and are generally poorer in species
representation (they are all located outside of where normal human activity occurs).
This is especially ironic and embarrassing for the government, as the 2004 zoning of the Great Barrier Reef pretty
much set the standard for global marine park development.
As the first country to undertake such a massive overhaul of
policy for conservation, Australia really needs to up their game and should be
concerned that they are not setting a high enough bar. Currently, a review is occurring
to address the shortcomings of the original plans and create more representative
parks. If we could achieve such great things in the past, we have an obligation
to set the same high standards now.
No comments:
Post a Comment